Skip to main content

2015 Ford Mustang Convertible 2.3 Ecoboost review

Ford's muscle car can also be had with a convertible roof and a 2.3-litre turbocharged engine rather than the big V8

What is it?:
It’s a Ford Mustang convertible. The last drop-top Mustang I tried was a V6-powered hire car more than a decade ago. It was terrible.

There’s something about an underpowered, overly flexible version of what in other forms is a decent coupé that makes them even more disappointing than if they were a stand-alone model. You’re aware of what it isn’t, and what it could be, not just what it is.

This new one can be had with either a turbocharged 2.3-litre four-cylinder engine or a 5.0-litre V8. Our test car is the former.

What's it like?:
The 312bhp 2.3-litre Ecoboost turbo is a decent engine, but it isn’t a V8. Ford is aware of that, so it augments the car’s sound through the audio speakers; noise cancelling takes out some real sounds, software adds some others.

It sounds okay, but engine rather than PlayStation enthusiasts will detect the artificiality. Still, it’s responsive, provides respectable performance and drives through the same slick six-speed manual gearbox as the V8. We haven’t tried an auto yet.

But a lot of roof has gone missing here. The Mustang is a long car, at 4.7 metres, and lopping off the section that covers the whole passenger compartment leaves a gaping hole that’s adequately covered by a fabric roof. Twist a handle to unlatch it and then it draws back electrically, provided you’re at a standstill.

There’s no option of a wind deflector, but windows up, at sensible speeds, and it’s relatively free of buffeting. Your locks will be gently tousled by the passing breeze, while you wonder why the image in the interior mirror is wobbling as you pass over bumps in the road.

The inevitable answer is that, along with the metalwork, so too has disappeared a large portion of the body’s torsional rigidity. The low-speed ride, mind you, is acceptable - at least as good as in the hard-top. Perhaps the flex in the chassis allows a little more compliance than the coupé.

Should I buy one?:
The compromises with the roof and engine leave the Mustang convertible in a slightly odd place - at least with this engine. It’s no better to drive than plenty of other convertibles at its £33,000, arguably no better looking, quite large on the outside compared to its size on the inside, and is a wide car to thread around.

You’d have to really, really want your four-cylinder convertible to be a Mustang to choose one. But it can also be had with the V8 (£37,005), which I suspect would pitch some of that allure back into it. There’s something to be said for some open-top V8 woofle. Certainly, what comes through the speakers can’t match it.

Ford Mustang Convertible 2.3 Ecoboost

Location Germany; On sale October; Price £33,000; Engine 4 cyls in line, 2300cc, turbo, petrol; Power 312bhp at 5500rpm; Torque 317lb ft at 3000rpm; Gearbox 6-spd manual; Kerb weight 1715kg; Top speed 145mph; 0-62mph 6.0sec (est); Economy 34.4mpg (combined).

Popular posts from this blog

Peugeot RC

The RC concept was designed at the Peugeot Style Centre. Intended as a true enthusiasts car, the real innovation lay in the fact that the car was designed as an "affordable" sports car. The Peugeot RC was the concept car that paved the way for the 2008 Peugeot RC HYmotion4 concept. Peugeot used the 2002 RC concept to compare performance and economy differences between comparable petrol and diesel engines. As an affordable sports car the RC had to deliver not only in terms of price, but there was the engine, the size and running costs, as well as driver comforts to consider. A wide panoramic windscreen and the cab forward seating helps the driver see all around the car and compensates for the effect caused by the length of the car. In the Petrol vs. Diesel experiment, Peugeot aimed to prove that an HDi engine could match the performance levels achieved from a petrol engine. And to demonstrate that it was not unreasonable to put an HDi engine in a sports car. The 2 resulti...

KTM X-Bow Superlight

The extensive use of bare carbon fibre has kept the weight to a minimum The KTM X-Bow Superlight is one of the variants of the KTM X-Bow model range. As the name suggests the Superlight is the lightest model in the range - but not by much, the base model KTM X-Bow is just 5 kg (11 lbs) heavier. Although the Superlight is a full 40 kg (88 lbs) lighter than the GT4 version. The weight reductions to the KTM X-Bow Superlight have been made possible through the extensive use of carbon fibre. The monocoque structure with integrated crash protection is composed entirely of carbon fibre and left unpainted to show of the carbon fibre weave. The few body panels which are fitted to the X-Bow Superlight are also formed from carbon fibre. Additional weight savings were also achieved through the use of unique light-alloy wheels finished in a dark lacquer. Powering the KTM X-Bow Superlight is the same Audi-sourced 2.0 litre turbocharged engine found in all the X-Bow models. This engine puts out 24...

Maserati Ghibli vs BMW 6 Series : Which Will You Buy?

When considering vehicles like Maserati Ghibli and the BWM 6 Series Gran Coupe, both reflect an effort toward blending dignified luxury with exhilarating performance. Though beholding vehicles of this caliber is always an exercise most fruitfully left to the natural eye, the image above serves as a simple example of each sedan’s inherent dignity. In lieu of experiencing each vehicle’s performance profile from behind the wheel, the table provided similarly works to demonstrate what both Ghibli and BMW’s 6 series have been engineered to accomplish. Comparing the Maserati Ghibli vs. BMW 6 Series in this regard yields a number of important emphases. Local clients will notice that both vehicles develop their identity around six-cylinder engines with a pair of strategic turbochargers. Yet regardless of identical displacement and analogous induction technology, Maserati serves its Ghibli clients with significantly greater quantities of horsepower and torque. In addition to t...