Skip to main content

BMW M4

The high-tech tour de force that is the new BMW M4 is packed with enough bits and bytes for the M faithful to seriously question what the Ultimate Driving Machine has become. Since the coupe shares its new-age guts with the equally fresh M3 sedan, we knew we needed to lay hands on a two-door with a proper enthusiast’s transmission: a row-your-own six-speed manual. As with the M3 we tested with the manual, the three-pedal setup is the best way to cut through the gauzy haze of the M4’s electronic wizardry.
DO IT YOURSELF
We’ve already covered the basics of the new M3/M4 in detail, including the lighter overall construction, advanced driver aids, and formidable 3.0-liter twin-turbocharged inline-six. Unlike the previous E92 M3’s high-revving V-8, the new S55 engine swells with torque and offers improved drivability. It may sound like an industrial air compressor at cold startup, but its full 406 lb-ft of twist hits at just 1850 rpm, with 425 horsepower peaking at 7300 versus the old V-8’s screaming 8300. Once warmed up, the aural signature goes sinister.
Our previous M4 tests were of cars fitted with the optional DCT seven-speed dual-clutch automatic ($2900), which offers a launch-control program, near-seamless shifts for maximum performance, and six settings split evenly between automatic and manual shift modes. Yet with so many electrons already coursing through the car—manufactured engine sounds through the stereo, three-stage stability control, three settings each for the engine, steering, and suspension—the DCT’s extra adjustments mostly just distance the driver farther from the action. Two customizable “M” buttons on the steering wheel help manage the plethora of setups, but it’s still a busy work environment.

SENSING A CONNECTION
At 3556 pounds, this M4 test car was the lightest M3/M4 we’ve had on our scales; curb weights for various configurations have ranged up to 3615. Braking from 70 mph (151 feet), lateral grip on the skidpad (0.98 g), and overall fuel economy (19 mpg) were all in line with previous tests. But changing gears yourself slows things down in a straight line: Our best run saw 60 mph achieved in 4.1 seconds and the quarter-mile passed in 12.4 at 117 mph, 0.4-second and 2-mph slower than the DCT M4 on both counts. Credit the dual-clutch’s launch control with the bulk of that.
Actually driving with the manual, however, is far more enjoyable as you work the well-oiled shifter and the perfectly spaced pedals. (The computer performs rev-matching downshifts when in Efficient and Sport modes, but in Sport Plus it’s all down to your skills.) The dual-plate clutch takes some care to modulate, as does the throttle when the turbos’ surge of torque overwhelms the rear tires with the traction control deactivated. But expending the effort to enrich your driving skill set yields a stronger connection to a car that’s growing stingier on feedback, particularly through the steering wheel.

CHOOSE WISELY
The DCT automatic is definitely easier to commute with day-to-day, but we wouldn’t spend three grand on it. The M4 is pricey enough at $65,150 to start, let alone at our test car’s eye-watering $83,325. The most significant upcharge was $8150 for gigantic carbon-ceramic brakes with gold calipers. They work great but are overkill unless you own property next to a racetrack. Also, we’d avoid the, um, interesting color combination of our example: Austin Yellow Metallic paint ($550), black 19-inch wheels ($1200), and a Sonoma Beige leather interior.
Other notable items on the window sticker included the $4000 Executive package (leather trim, head-up display, heated steering wheel, rearview camera, keyless access and start, a parking-assist system, headlamp washers, and satellite radio) and the $1900 Lighting package (adaptive LED headlights and automatic high beams).

Popular posts from this blog

Peugeot RC

The RC concept was designed at the Peugeot Style Centre. Intended as a true enthusiasts car, the real innovation lay in the fact that the car was designed as an "affordable" sports car. The Peugeot RC was the concept car that paved the way for the 2008 Peugeot RC HYmotion4 concept. Peugeot used the 2002 RC concept to compare performance and economy differences between comparable petrol and diesel engines. As an affordable sports car the RC had to deliver not only in terms of price, but there was the engine, the size and running costs, as well as driver comforts to consider. A wide panoramic windscreen and the cab forward seating helps the driver see all around the car and compensates for the effect caused by the length of the car. In the Petrol vs. Diesel experiment, Peugeot aimed to prove that an HDi engine could match the performance levels achieved from a petrol engine. And to demonstrate that it was not unreasonable to put an HDi engine in a sports car. The 2 resulti...

KTM X-Bow Superlight

The extensive use of bare carbon fibre has kept the weight to a minimum The KTM X-Bow Superlight is one of the variants of the KTM X-Bow model range. As the name suggests the Superlight is the lightest model in the range - but not by much, the base model KTM X-Bow is just 5 kg (11 lbs) heavier. Although the Superlight is a full 40 kg (88 lbs) lighter than the GT4 version. The weight reductions to the KTM X-Bow Superlight have been made possible through the extensive use of carbon fibre. The monocoque structure with integrated crash protection is composed entirely of carbon fibre and left unpainted to show of the carbon fibre weave. The few body panels which are fitted to the X-Bow Superlight are also formed from carbon fibre. Additional weight savings were also achieved through the use of unique light-alloy wheels finished in a dark lacquer. Powering the KTM X-Bow Superlight is the same Audi-sourced 2.0 litre turbocharged engine found in all the X-Bow models. This engine puts out 24...

Maserati Ghibli vs BMW 6 Series : Which Will You Buy?

When considering vehicles like Maserati Ghibli and the BWM 6 Series Gran Coupe, both reflect an effort toward blending dignified luxury with exhilarating performance. Though beholding vehicles of this caliber is always an exercise most fruitfully left to the natural eye, the image above serves as a simple example of each sedan’s inherent dignity. In lieu of experiencing each vehicle’s performance profile from behind the wheel, the table provided similarly works to demonstrate what both Ghibli and BMW’s 6 series have been engineered to accomplish. Comparing the Maserati Ghibli vs. BMW 6 Series in this regard yields a number of important emphases. Local clients will notice that both vehicles develop their identity around six-cylinder engines with a pair of strategic turbochargers. Yet regardless of identical displacement and analogous induction technology, Maserati serves its Ghibli clients with significantly greater quantities of horsepower and torque. In addition to t...