Skip to main content

BMW M4

The high-tech tour de force that is the new BMW M4 is packed with enough bits and bytes for the M faithful to seriously question what the Ultimate Driving Machine has become. Since the coupe shares its new-age guts with the equally fresh M3 sedan, we knew we needed to lay hands on a two-door with a proper enthusiast’s transmission: a row-your-own six-speed manual. As with the M3 we tested with the manual, the three-pedal setup is the best way to cut through the gauzy haze of the M4’s electronic wizardry.
DO IT YOURSELF
We’ve already covered the basics of the new M3/M4 in detail, including the lighter overall construction, advanced driver aids, and formidable 3.0-liter twin-turbocharged inline-six. Unlike the previous E92 M3’s high-revving V-8, the new S55 engine swells with torque and offers improved drivability. It may sound like an industrial air compressor at cold startup, but its full 406 lb-ft of twist hits at just 1850 rpm, with 425 horsepower peaking at 7300 versus the old V-8’s screaming 8300. Once warmed up, the aural signature goes sinister.
Our previous M4 tests were of cars fitted with the optional DCT seven-speed dual-clutch automatic ($2900), which offers a launch-control program, near-seamless shifts for maximum performance, and six settings split evenly between automatic and manual shift modes. Yet with so many electrons already coursing through the car—manufactured engine sounds through the stereo, three-stage stability control, three settings each for the engine, steering, and suspension—the DCT’s extra adjustments mostly just distance the driver farther from the action. Two customizable “M” buttons on the steering wheel help manage the plethora of setups, but it’s still a busy work environment.

SENSING A CONNECTION
At 3556 pounds, this M4 test car was the lightest M3/M4 we’ve had on our scales; curb weights for various configurations have ranged up to 3615. Braking from 70 mph (151 feet), lateral grip on the skidpad (0.98 g), and overall fuel economy (19 mpg) were all in line with previous tests. But changing gears yourself slows things down in a straight line: Our best run saw 60 mph achieved in 4.1 seconds and the quarter-mile passed in 12.4 at 117 mph, 0.4-second and 2-mph slower than the DCT M4 on both counts. Credit the dual-clutch’s launch control with the bulk of that.
Actually driving with the manual, however, is far more enjoyable as you work the well-oiled shifter and the perfectly spaced pedals. (The computer performs rev-matching downshifts when in Efficient and Sport modes, but in Sport Plus it’s all down to your skills.) The dual-plate clutch takes some care to modulate, as does the throttle when the turbos’ surge of torque overwhelms the rear tires with the traction control deactivated. But expending the effort to enrich your driving skill set yields a stronger connection to a car that’s growing stingier on feedback, particularly through the steering wheel.

CHOOSE WISELY
The DCT automatic is definitely easier to commute with day-to-day, but we wouldn’t spend three grand on it. The M4 is pricey enough at $65,150 to start, let alone at our test car’s eye-watering $83,325. The most significant upcharge was $8150 for gigantic carbon-ceramic brakes with gold calipers. They work great but are overkill unless you own property next to a racetrack. Also, we’d avoid the, um, interesting color combination of our example: Austin Yellow Metallic paint ($550), black 19-inch wheels ($1200), and a Sonoma Beige leather interior.
Other notable items on the window sticker included the $4000 Executive package (leather trim, head-up display, heated steering wheel, rearview camera, keyless access and start, a parking-assist system, headlamp washers, and satellite radio) and the $1900 Lighting package (adaptive LED headlights and automatic high beams).

Popular posts from this blog

Maserati Ghibli vs BMW 6 Series : Which Will You Buy?

When considering vehicles like Maserati Ghibli and the BWM 6 Series Gran Coupe, both reflect an effort toward blending dignified luxury with exhilarating performance. Though beholding vehicles of this caliber is always an exercise most fruitfully left to the natural eye, the image above serves as a simple example of each sedan’s inherent dignity. In lieu of experiencing each vehicle’s performance profile from behind the wheel, the table provided similarly works to demonstrate what both Ghibli and BMW’s 6 series have been engineered to accomplish. Comparing the Maserati Ghibli vs. BMW 6 Series in this regard yields a number of important emphases. Local clients will notice that both vehicles develop their identity around six-cylinder engines with a pair of strategic turbochargers. Yet regardless of identical displacement and analogous induction technology, Maserati serves its Ghibli clients with significantly greater quantities of horsepower and torque. In addition to t...

McLaren 650S Sprint

McLaren’s new 650S model now comes in three flavors, the standard road going 650S, the competition-spec 650S GT3 for serious racers, and now there’s the 650S Sprint which is aimed at track enthusiasts who still want a little bit of comfort. The 650S Sprint also replaces the MP4-12C-based 12C Sprint as McLaren’s track toy for the super-rich. Compared to the road model, the 650S Sprint features increased downforce and better cooling airflow to the 3.8 litre twin-turbocharged V8. It also features a competition-spec fuel tank and quick-fill cap, a larger radiator borrowed from the GT3 car, a new hood with additional cooling ducts for the radiator, front wing louvres for improved airflow, reduced ride height and recalibrated damping and spring rates, 19-inch center-locking race wheels with either Pirelli slicks or wet tires, onboard air jack system, and an upgraded braking system. On the inside the McLaren 650S Sprint features a stripped-out design with a FIA-approved rol...

Lamborghini Canto – What the Murcielago could have been?

Back in the late 1990s, when Lamborghini were starting to realise they needed a replacement for the ageing Diablo, they started reviewing design proposals from various automotive design firms. Zagato’s offering was the Zagato L147 SuperDiablo, or as it was to be later known, the Lamborghini Canto. The Lamborghini Canto first appeared in 1998, it arrived only two years after another Zagato designed Lamborghini concept had been unveiled, the Diablo-based Raptor. The cars shared a number of similar features, including the wraparound windows, triangular lateral air intakes, and trademark double-bubble roof. However of the two, the earlier Raptor was probably the better looking. Clearly Ferdinand Piech – head of the Volkswagen Group – thought so too. After VW bought Lamborghini in 1999, one of his first decisions was to review the Canto’s development and redesign the concept. The car was re-engineered and the rear extensively restyled to include smaller air intakes....