Skip to main content

Audi S5

When Audi’s S5 coupe debuted for 2008 as the first model built on the company’s B8 architecture, we demonstrated little restraint in praising its sexy sheetmetal and the 4.2-liter V-8 nestled between its front fenders. Styled by Italian-born design chief Walter de’Silva, the S5 and its slightly less potent A5 stablemate ushered in a new era of Audi design, one that has seen exterior aesthetics elevated among company priorities to a position alongside performance and technology. The duo was joined shortly thereafter by a sassy pair of cabriolet doppelgängers—albeit with a 3.0-liter supercharged V-6 in the S5 droptop rather than the S5 coupe’s hearty V-8—followed by the 2013 U.S. debut of the ultimate manifestation of performance within Audi’s 5 lineup, the quick but clinical RS5.

Strength in Numbers
Aligning with its droptop analogue, the 2013 S5 coupe has dumped its 4.2-liter V-8 for the increasingly ubiquitous 333-hp supercharged six. (This despite wearing “3.0T” badging that implies the presence of a turbo.) Down 21 ponies to the 354-horse V-8, the V-6 manages to hold the line on torque, equaling the eight-holer’s 325 lb-ft. C/D testing confirms further parity: Our six-speed-manual 2013 S5 exactly matched the 4.8-second 0-to-60-mph and 13.4-second quarter-mile times of the last six-speed manual V-8 S5 we tested. (Just for a point of reference, our 2013 RS5 kicked out 4.4- and 12.8-second figures.) And the V-6 delivers serious fuel savings, with the S5 now earning EPA ratings of 17 mpg city/26 highway versus 14/22 for the V-8. In real-world driving, we averaged 20 mpg, an improvement of 5 mpg over the thirsty V-8’s 15 mpg.

We also recorded improved roadholding numbers on the 300-foot skidpad, the 2013 delivering 0.96 g of grip compared to the V-8’s 0.88. Stopping distances from 70 mph were basically the same, with the pedal remaining firm but rather indifferent in terms of feedback. As for weight, our 2013 S5 tipped the C/D scales at 3895 pounds, 77 more than its eight-cylinder ancestor. Weight distribution, however, improved slightly (55.7 percent front/44.3 rear for the V-6 against 57.7/42.3 for the V-8), illustrating just how large a role balance plays in a vehicle’s handling. The optional, $1250 active sport differential fitted to our test vehicle, which continuously varies the amount of torque distributed between the rear wheels, doesn’t hurt either. Rolling stock on this car consisted of 255/35 Dunlop SP Sport Maxx GT summer tires wrapped around optional 19-inch wheels ($800).
Anodyne Operation
The switch to an electromechanical steering system actually seemed to improve feel and communication over the previous car’s hydraulic setup, which is no small accomplishment. Our car had Audi’s three-mode (Comfort, Auto, and Dynamic) Drive Select system as part of the Driver Assist package ($3250). Comfort isn’t “too soft” so much as it feels inauthentic to the S5’s mission as a sporty alternative to the cushier A5. Auto mode would pass for a “sport” mode in most other cars, and it quickens the steering ratio and stiffens the dampers to what we consider appropriate, which is to say it delivers maximum control with slightly firmer—but far from punishing—ride quality. Dynamic adjusts the settings for changing road conditions based on input from sensors, and is transparent if nothing else; at no point does its operation induce inorganic responses or sensations. The six-speed manual transmission loves to play, its action firm but always precise. Clutch engagement is so unobtrusively smooth and linear that you only realize how refined it is once you climb into something else. Although the S5 is perfectly content to loaf all day, the tools are there to hustle when you want. Bottom line: The car moves with an ease that belies its size and weight.

Popular posts from this blog

Maserati Ghibli vs BMW 6 Series : Which Will You Buy?

When considering vehicles like Maserati Ghibli and the BWM 6 Series Gran Coupe, both reflect an effort toward blending dignified luxury with exhilarating performance. Though beholding vehicles of this caliber is always an exercise most fruitfully left to the natural eye, the image above serves as a simple example of each sedan’s inherent dignity. In lieu of experiencing each vehicle’s performance profile from behind the wheel, the table provided similarly works to demonstrate what both Ghibli and BMW’s 6 series have been engineered to accomplish. Comparing the Maserati Ghibli vs. BMW 6 Series in this regard yields a number of important emphases. Local clients will notice that both vehicles develop their identity around six-cylinder engines with a pair of strategic turbochargers. Yet regardless of identical displacement and analogous induction technology, Maserati serves its Ghibli clients with significantly greater quantities of horsepower and torque. In addition to t...

McLaren 650S Sprint

McLaren’s new 650S model now comes in three flavors, the standard road going 650S, the competition-spec 650S GT3 for serious racers, and now there’s the 650S Sprint which is aimed at track enthusiasts who still want a little bit of comfort. The 650S Sprint also replaces the MP4-12C-based 12C Sprint as McLaren’s track toy for the super-rich. Compared to the road model, the 650S Sprint features increased downforce and better cooling airflow to the 3.8 litre twin-turbocharged V8. It also features a competition-spec fuel tank and quick-fill cap, a larger radiator borrowed from the GT3 car, a new hood with additional cooling ducts for the radiator, front wing louvres for improved airflow, reduced ride height and recalibrated damping and spring rates, 19-inch center-locking race wheels with either Pirelli slicks or wet tires, onboard air jack system, and an upgraded braking system. On the inside the McLaren 650S Sprint features a stripped-out design with a FIA-approved rol...

Lamborghini Canto – What the Murcielago could have been?

Back in the late 1990s, when Lamborghini were starting to realise they needed a replacement for the ageing Diablo, they started reviewing design proposals from various automotive design firms. Zagato’s offering was the Zagato L147 SuperDiablo, or as it was to be later known, the Lamborghini Canto. The Lamborghini Canto first appeared in 1998, it arrived only two years after another Zagato designed Lamborghini concept had been unveiled, the Diablo-based Raptor. The cars shared a number of similar features, including the wraparound windows, triangular lateral air intakes, and trademark double-bubble roof. However of the two, the earlier Raptor was probably the better looking. Clearly Ferdinand Piech – head of the Volkswagen Group – thought so too. After VW bought Lamborghini in 1999, one of his first decisions was to review the Canto’s development and redesign the concept. The car was re-engineered and the rear extensively restyled to include smaller air intakes....