Skip to main content

BMW 3-series

Of course you’re wondering, so we’ll just tell you up front: 39 mpg. That’s what we got over 522 miles of driving with the BMW 328d rear-drive sedan, which amounts to one fill-up. It’s also 4-mpg better than the 35 mpg we saw from two 2014 328ds, an xDrive sedan and our long-term xDrive wagon (through 25,000 miles, at least).
That’s all the choices: rear- or all-wheel drive, sedan or wagon. The only 3-series diesel available in the U.S. comes with an eight-speed automatic, whether you like it or not, but confers a real mileage benefit compared with our long-term 2012 328i manual (27 mpg over 40,000 miles). Neo-Prius fuel economy in the industry’s benchmark sports sedan? Sign here, please.
Our U.K. correspondent, Mike Duff, doesn’t think much of BMW diesels, especially the small ones. Recently he was overheard calling them “crap,” which is British shorthand for “not quite as lovely as the alternatives.” Duff wonders why some Americans get all frothy about a 3-series diesel when they’re common as cats in Europe, where they’re the preferred mount of widows, vicars, airport taxi drivers, and other people who want BMW prestige and luxury on the slowest, most frugal possible terms. In Duff’s estimation, a 328d is as close as BMW comes to building a Buick Verano.

Well, you’re all quite acquainted with the F30-generation 3-series, thanks to the umpteen million stories we’ve done on this vehicle, calling out its sophisticated handling, its sugary engines, its fine brakes, and its diminished steering, which is definitely colder than the previous E90’s. None of those observations change for the 328d, except the diesel engine and its numbers.
To wit: In the United States, you pay a $1500 premium to swap out the 2015-model 328i’s base 2.0-liter turbo gasoline four for the 328d’s 2.0-liter turbo-diesel. It’s not a huge hit, considering you get better economy, a major torque bump of 25 lb-ft, and a lot of fancy new antipollution equipment. Rated horsepower drops from 240 to 181, as horsepower always takes a dive when you install a slower-turning diesel.
When will the $1500 pay itself back in fuel savings? If you accept our fuel-economy numbers as your own and take the U.S. fuel-price averages as this is written ($3.50 per gallon for premium, $3.66 for diesel), you’ll pay off the 328d’s diesel in about 42,000 miles. Of course, the break-even point can vary depending on your own mileage and the disparity between gasoline and diesel prices where you drive.
If you are the leasing type and plan to turn it in at two or three years, forget any economic benefit to a 328d. The remaining advantage is the convenience of a 500-plus-mile range, which you could regard as an extracost option like a sunroof or a fancier stereo. Not having to stop so often at fuel pumps—especially greasy diesel pumps—is worth something to some people.
While a 328d buyer gains significant economy, he or she is also sacrificing. A reason that blue spinner on the hood commands the big premium is the company’s long history of building graceful engines that swing to high revs while making only the most dulcet of tones. In the diesel, you chuck a thoroughbred and in its place install a clattering plow mule of an engine that spends most of its life lazing between 1000 and 2000 rpm, with unenthusiastic plods to 4000 rpm when you’re really on it. This engine is an industrial thing built for a prosaic purpose rather than to satisfy a passion.

Let’s not overstate it. As diesels go, the 328d’s is pleasant enough, the steel-cut rattling of its four jugs noticeable but well muffled in the cabin. The immediacy of peak torque arriving at 1750 rpm and staying through to 2750 rpm ensures that the 328d never feels slow. The 60-mph benchmark passes in 6.8 seconds, which is fast enough that you won’t get flattened while merging but at the muddy bottom of the sports-sedan pond.

Popular posts from this blog

Peugeot RC

The RC concept was designed at the Peugeot Style Centre. Intended as a true enthusiasts car, the real innovation lay in the fact that the car was designed as an "affordable" sports car. The Peugeot RC was the concept car that paved the way for the 2008 Peugeot RC HYmotion4 concept. Peugeot used the 2002 RC concept to compare performance and economy differences between comparable petrol and diesel engines. As an affordable sports car the RC had to deliver not only in terms of price, but there was the engine, the size and running costs, as well as driver comforts to consider. A wide panoramic windscreen and the cab forward seating helps the driver see all around the car and compensates for the effect caused by the length of the car. In the Petrol vs. Diesel experiment, Peugeot aimed to prove that an HDi engine could match the performance levels achieved from a petrol engine. And to demonstrate that it was not unreasonable to put an HDi engine in a sports car. The 2 resulti...

KTM X-Bow Superlight

The extensive use of bare carbon fibre has kept the weight to a minimum The KTM X-Bow Superlight is one of the variants of the KTM X-Bow model range. As the name suggests the Superlight is the lightest model in the range - but not by much, the base model KTM X-Bow is just 5 kg (11 lbs) heavier. Although the Superlight is a full 40 kg (88 lbs) lighter than the GT4 version. The weight reductions to the KTM X-Bow Superlight have been made possible through the extensive use of carbon fibre. The monocoque structure with integrated crash protection is composed entirely of carbon fibre and left unpainted to show of the carbon fibre weave. The few body panels which are fitted to the X-Bow Superlight are also formed from carbon fibre. Additional weight savings were also achieved through the use of unique light-alloy wheels finished in a dark lacquer. Powering the KTM X-Bow Superlight is the same Audi-sourced 2.0 litre turbocharged engine found in all the X-Bow models. This engine puts out 24...

Maserati Ghibli vs BMW 6 Series : Which Will You Buy?

When considering vehicles like Maserati Ghibli and the BWM 6 Series Gran Coupe, both reflect an effort toward blending dignified luxury with exhilarating performance. Though beholding vehicles of this caliber is always an exercise most fruitfully left to the natural eye, the image above serves as a simple example of each sedan’s inherent dignity. In lieu of experiencing each vehicle’s performance profile from behind the wheel, the table provided similarly works to demonstrate what both Ghibli and BMW’s 6 series have been engineered to accomplish. Comparing the Maserati Ghibli vs. BMW 6 Series in this regard yields a number of important emphases. Local clients will notice that both vehicles develop their identity around six-cylinder engines with a pair of strategic turbochargers. Yet regardless of identical displacement and analogous induction technology, Maserati serves its Ghibli clients with significantly greater quantities of horsepower and torque. In addition to t...