Skip to main content

2015 Ford Mustang

While we have nothing but praise and admiration for Ford’s decision to spread stick shifts around the new Mustang lineup, the fact is that many of you will buy automatics just as your forebears did in the 1960s. Back then, slushboxes were the gooey, horsepower-gobbling Neanderthal ancestors to today’s computer-linked, electrohydraulic torque-thrusters. The basics of clutched planetary gearsets remain unchanged, but today’s performance is entirely different. Congratulations on surviving to the Age of Automatics We Can Live With.
The new Mustang GT is a solid citizen of this era, partly because the six-speed automatic transmission is so good as to be nearly transparent, and partly because Ford has built a car around the lazy-left-foot gearbox that isn’t trying to be excessively sporty. The GT is powerful and fast, to be sure, but a bit more mellow and refined in this, the new Mustang’s initial V-8 iteration. We already know of three more hot Mustangs coming, the Shelby GT350, GT350R, and, in all likelihood, a fresh GT500; these will grind the Mustang to a harder edge, so this big-hearted cruiser is for people who don’t want their finger in the socket for every mile.
The 10Best-winning Mustang GT starts at $32,925 with a stick, and for the auto you must check an $1195 option box that also brings steering-wheel paddles and remote start. Do that and you’re locked out of the GT Performance Pack, a $2495 slew of goodies that includes Brembo brakes, 19-inch rims wrapped in summer tires, and a 3.73:1 Torsen limited-slip differential. You can option 19s and a 3.55:1 rear end separately but not the full shot. So Ford is not positioning the slusher for street racers who just don’t want to shift. It’s for people wanting V-8 power but more luxury than go-fast gear. The automatic’s option price remains consistent up through the GT’s Premium and 50th Anniversary trim levels. (The limited-edition latter model was the only way to get the automatic with the Performance Pack.)

A GOOD SELF-SHIFTER
Automatic gearboxes have “long been a millstone around our neck,” one former Ford engineer told us once, but the ghosts of fragile AODs and AXODs have largely been exorcised, especially as Ford has moved to the modern rear-drive 6R unit based on the ubiquitous and sturdy ZF 6HP26. For the new Mustang, Ford says it redesigned and strengthened the case for enhanced driveline stiffness and reduced shift shock.
Whatever the company is doing, it’s working. Left alone in D, the transmission snaps new ratios into place with a lubricated, seamless efficiency. Take control with the paddles and the engine pleasingly matches revs on the downshift. Neither the roar nor the shove of the four-cam, 435-hp V-8 seems dimmed by its marriage to a torque converter.
Even on the automatic’s loose set of Pirelli P Zero Nero all-season tires, the GT is able to get out of the hole as quick as the stick running the optional summer rubber. We saw 60 mph pass in 4.5 seconds and the quarter-mile in 13.0 seconds at 113 mph, identical to the manual’s times. Still, the low-grip rubber prevented recording anything better than a 0.83-g skidpad run, far less than the 0.95 posted by the last stick-shift car we tested on the summer Pirelli P Zeros.
THE AUTO’S FOR THOSE ON AUTO
In comparison to, say, a Camaro SS 1LE, the basic Mustang GT is a floater. Ford has chosen a relatively mushy suspension tune that makes the GT a serene choice for long highway trips but a slightly squishier steed on the twisty sections. At times, such as when crossing onto the varied surfaces of bridge overpasses at 70 mph, the nose develops a distinctly vintage circular bob as the circa-3800-pound car does a slight shimmy and porpoise at the same time. Undulations can really work over the base GT’s springs, while the all-season tires can ruin a good switchback with some squealing understeer. But the bumps are likewise better absorbed and the occupants remain largely isolated from the worst.

Popular posts from this blog

Peugeot RC

The RC concept was designed at the Peugeot Style Centre. Intended as a true enthusiasts car, the real innovation lay in the fact that the car was designed as an "affordable" sports car. The Peugeot RC was the concept car that paved the way for the 2008 Peugeot RC HYmotion4 concept. Peugeot used the 2002 RC concept to compare performance and economy differences between comparable petrol and diesel engines. As an affordable sports car the RC had to deliver not only in terms of price, but there was the engine, the size and running costs, as well as driver comforts to consider. A wide panoramic windscreen and the cab forward seating helps the driver see all around the car and compensates for the effect caused by the length of the car. In the Petrol vs. Diesel experiment, Peugeot aimed to prove that an HDi engine could match the performance levels achieved from a petrol engine. And to demonstrate that it was not unreasonable to put an HDi engine in a sports car. The 2 resulti...

KTM X-Bow Superlight

The extensive use of bare carbon fibre has kept the weight to a minimum The KTM X-Bow Superlight is one of the variants of the KTM X-Bow model range. As the name suggests the Superlight is the lightest model in the range - but not by much, the base model KTM X-Bow is just 5 kg (11 lbs) heavier. Although the Superlight is a full 40 kg (88 lbs) lighter than the GT4 version. The weight reductions to the KTM X-Bow Superlight have been made possible through the extensive use of carbon fibre. The monocoque structure with integrated crash protection is composed entirely of carbon fibre and left unpainted to show of the carbon fibre weave. The few body panels which are fitted to the X-Bow Superlight are also formed from carbon fibre. Additional weight savings were also achieved through the use of unique light-alloy wheels finished in a dark lacquer. Powering the KTM X-Bow Superlight is the same Audi-sourced 2.0 litre turbocharged engine found in all the X-Bow models. This engine puts out 24...

Maserati Ghibli vs BMW 6 Series : Which Will You Buy?

When considering vehicles like Maserati Ghibli and the BWM 6 Series Gran Coupe, both reflect an effort toward blending dignified luxury with exhilarating performance. Though beholding vehicles of this caliber is always an exercise most fruitfully left to the natural eye, the image above serves as a simple example of each sedan’s inherent dignity. In lieu of experiencing each vehicle’s performance profile from behind the wheel, the table provided similarly works to demonstrate what both Ghibli and BMW’s 6 series have been engineered to accomplish. Comparing the Maserati Ghibli vs. BMW 6 Series in this regard yields a number of important emphases. Local clients will notice that both vehicles develop their identity around six-cylinder engines with a pair of strategic turbochargers. Yet regardless of identical displacement and analogous induction technology, Maserati serves its Ghibli clients with significantly greater quantities of horsepower and torque. In addition to t...