Skip to main content

Mitsubishi Outlander 2.3 GX5

Should you even care about the new Mitsubishi Outlander?

The new Outlander is based on the old model but has a revised diesel powerplant and new transmission that offers superb stats, while there’s loads more room and tech to go with it. It’s four-wheel drive and comes with a six-speed auto and seven seats. This is the top-of-the-line GX5, which costs £33,999 to make a slightly more than the flagship five-seat Honda CR-V and seven-seat Hyundai Santa Fe. Can it muster a genuine fight to its more popular rivals?

So is just the old car with a new shell?

That’d be selling it short. The slightly odd styling, which is a mix of curves and a slightly bulbous, almost Peugeot-like nose, is at odds against competition that’s tossed out the French Curves and relied on setsquares instead. It’s lost that jacked-up Lancer look of the previous model, with a stronger identity of its own, but underneath our test car is the old car’s platform meaning it has the same wheelbase. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that, as it gives the Outlander some genuine off-road capability and also offers loads of space. What is new is the six-speed transmission, which weighs less and changes gears much more smoothly than before. The 2268cc aluminum diesel four-pot is the only engine offered (Mitsubishi calls it a 2.2-litre, but it’s closer to 2.3).

So does it drive like a car or a truck?

The diesel is not in VW diesel passenger car leagues in terms of refinement, but it’s not exactly a rough engine either. Claimed output is 148bhp, which is down from 154bhp, but the Outlander now weighs 135kg less than the equivalent previous model, so it feels perkier to drive. Fewer kilos also mean it can getaway with 14 Ib ft less torque too, with 266 Ib ft from a lower 1500rpm. In a straight line, it doesn’t feel heavy or cumbersome. In fact, mash the throttle and the slightly delayed response shows not only the more usable torque, but also the soft suspension. Changes of direction aren’t its forte, as despite the all-wheel drive’s grip, body control is sloppy at speed, and while the brake pedal has a solid feel, there’s a heap of dive under braking. It requires a deft touch and patience to drive, especially around central London, where it somehow seems to know it’s in the capital and hence drinks diesel like a stockbroker sinking champagne before 2008. Paddleshifters behind the steering wheel? A little optimistic…

Can you switch the four-wheel drive off?

No, but the Outlander will do it for you via it’s auto mode. The chrome-rimmed button in the centre console switches between auto and eco, where it sends drive to the front wheels and only feeds the rear wheels in slippery situations. This saves fuel, which is most notable on the motorway, where it seems to be the miser that Mitsubishi promises and actually achieves better than 40mpg. That’s not too far short of the combined claim of 48.7 combined figure, but still well shy of the 55.4mpg extra urban figure.

It offers loads of space, and acronyms?

Absolutely. As well as the ones we all ignore, like ABS and ESP, the Outlander has ACC (Adaptive Cruise Control) with a speed limiter, FCM (Forward Collision Mitigation) and LDW (Lane Departure Warning). You can adjust the distances for the cruise and FCM system, too.

The Outlander has a Master’s degree in space, with enough room in the back for three adults, with particularly good headroom. There’s a third row of seats, but save these for small children or adults that demand a lift then never return the favour. Luggage space is improved, with up to 1022 litres when both rows of rear seats are folded flat. There’s an electronic tailgate, but it’s frustratingly slow at opening and makes all sorts of noises to let your neighbours know that it’s 3am and you’re finally home. Same goes for the proximity key, which wouldn’t work in my jacket pocket, defeating the purpose…

You haven’t mentioned the cabin, so it must be a non-event?

The cabin’s design isn’t a revelation, but you can’t criticise the fit and finish. The gloss black stuff surrounding the centre screen isn’t the classiest, but that’s not what the Outlander’s going for. This is the top model – the GX5 –and refreshingly, Mitsubishi hasn’t added a single option to it. The leather seats offer a high driving position as they’re a little firm and flat, which you notice on long journeys, and the position of some of the buttons – which are lost behind the wheel – is something you’d get used to. The nav is easy to read, and has handy features such as the next services etc. and also doubles as the screen for the reversing camera. While the camera’s not so clear at night, the Bi-xenons are brilliant at turning night into day.

Verdict

You don’t buy an Outlander for driving dynamics or entertainment, but for space, practicality and low running costs – and that’s exactly what it does.
It has more space, better drivability and lower running costs than before and isn’t too bad to drive. It’s not badly made, either, and comes loaded with gear, but it’s not as car-like to drive as the thirstier Hyundai Sante Fe, which comes with more equipment for slightly less cash. It is a step up from its predecessor though, but the main drawcard will likely be the Outlander PHEV, which lands later this year with a claimed 149mpg. Depending on price, that might mix things up a bit…

Popular posts from this blog

Lamborghini Canto – What the Murcielago could have been?

Back in the late 1990s, when Lamborghini were starting to realise they needed a replacement for the ageing Diablo, they started reviewing design proposals from various automotive design firms. Zagato’s offering was the Zagato L147 SuperDiablo, or as it was to be later known, the Lamborghini Canto. The Lamborghini Canto first appeared in 1998, it arrived only two years after another Zagato designed Lamborghini concept had been unveiled, the Diablo-based Raptor. The cars shared a number of similar features, including the wraparound windows, triangular lateral air intakes, and trademark double-bubble roof. However of the two, the earlier Raptor was probably the better looking. Clearly Ferdinand Piech – head of the Volkswagen Group – thought so too. After VW bought Lamborghini in 1999, one of his first decisions was to review the Canto’s development and redesign the concept. The car was re-engineered and the rear extensively restyled to include smaller air intakes. The engine was also up

Lamborghini Resonare Concept

The Lamborghini Resonare concept was created by 29-year-old Polish designer Pawel Czyzewski, it took him whole year to complete in exterior and interior details by using the Autodesk 3DS MAX software for modeling and rendering. According to Pawel Czyzewski, the main goal was to create a very futuristic, luxury, provocative and aggressive look, while still keep the Lamborghini style with the body line of the brand. Pawel Czyzewski was born in 1985 and currently resides in Lubin, Poland. He graduated from the University of Maria Curie-Sklodowska in Lublin and is focused on: Automotive Design, Industrial Design, and Interior Design. Some of the most successful projects of car concepts designs by Pawel Czyzewski include the: Gangloff Bugatti, Ferrari Invisum, Mazda Tamashii, Tricar Invisum, Arrano Invisum, Legarto Invisum and the Invisum among others. Have more information about this car than please comment us or email us at roadstrikersIN@gmail.com Thank you

McLaren P2 by Rakesh

The McLaren P2 is a concept created by Rakesh Bag , a Student of The Aditya Birla Public School , Veraval , Gujarat from INDIA The styling of the McLaren P2 is more attractive and less clinical than the McLaren P1 , but you can bet your entire worldly possessions on the fact every last millimetre of the bodywork has been extensivley analysed in the windtunnel. The front is unique and original, the way lower part of the bumper flows back into the ‘C’ shaped headlights is inspired. And the P2’s rear end has got to be one of the best in the business. Stunning. “the McLaren P1 and P2 will be the result of 50 years of racing and road car heritage. Twenty years ago we raised the supercar performance bar with the McLaren F1 and our goal with the McLaren P1 and P2 is to redefine it once again.” “Our aim is not necessarily to be the fastest in absolute top speed but to be the quickest and most rewarding series production road car on a circuit,” adds McLaren Automotive Managing Director Anton