Skip to main content

Dodge Challenger

There are two things we need to get straight before we embark on this review of the 2015 Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack.
1. No, this is not the Hellcat, as half of the people we encountered thought (or hoped) it was. No, it is not the supercharged one. No, it doesn’t have 700 horsepower.
2. Mopar fans are not like the rest of us. That might just be because Mopars aren’t like other cars. A few bits of evidence: The Mod Top; the “meep, meep” horn on the Road Runner; and a general obsession with cartoon characters. Also, Dodge briefly produced a pickup named the Warlock.
It’s certainly not news that the Challenger is unlike its presumed competition, the Ford Mustang and Chevrolet’s Camaro. It’s a monstrous thing with a buns-up wide rear end; in the tested R/T Scat Pack form, it weighs 416 pounds more than a new Mustang GT. Get out of your head the idea that the Challenger should be as satisfying a sports coupe as the Mustang or Camaro, though, and there is much joy to be had within its outsized dimensions. That’s particularly true in the R/T Scat Pack version, which borrows its rip-snorting 485-hp 6.4-liter V-8 from the pricier Challenger SRT 392. Classic muscle-car strategy there. Bolt it to a firm-shifting Tremec TR-6060 six-speed manual and you have a vehicle capable of matching its lighter competitors at the drag strip (or test track, in this case).
It bludgeoned its way to 60 mph in 4.4 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 12.9 seconds at 113 mph. That’s a tenth of a second quicker than the 2015 Mustang GT in both measures. Sure, it takes the additional 1466 cubic centimeters of engine displacement to get it done. While there are replacements for displacement, a stonking 6.4-liter V-8 is still a pretty effective means to the end. And it sounds positively feral doing the deed. It’s musical enough that we routinely gave it one last throttle pump immediately before shutting it down as a sort of coda to every trip in the car.

Okay, so a monster engine in a big, heavy car can still be a fast thing. But surely that 4226-pound curb weight makes the Challenger a pig, right? Well, yeah, sort of. But it’s a well-mannered pig, anyway. Hop out of a Mustang or a Camaro and directly into the Challenger Scat Pack and you will feel as if you’ve just swapped your pony car/sports coupe for a pickup truck. The perceived size and weight of the Challenger is even greater than the reality.
But, hang on. What’s this? The Challenger’s body, updated for 2015 with a few design cues from the 1971 model, is surprisingly well controlled. This pig does not wallow. Instead, it responds promptly to inputs from its big-diameter steering wheel (through a new rack-mounted electric-assist system with a tune specifically for the Scat Pack).
Credit the good manners to the Super Track Pak (no “c” in this Pak, because Mopar heritage) suspension tune. It comes standard on the Scat Pack car (with lowered ride height, Bilstein dampers, and larger front and rear antiroll bars), so this Challenger doesn’t heel over or push excessively. It squats a bit on hard acceleration in time-honored muscle-car tradition. Nothing untoward. Push it to the limit—imagine trying to keep up with a well-driven Mustang GT on a back road—and things start to get sloppy, with the suspension bottoming out on sharp heaves. Cool it a bit, and all is well.
Despite the performance-oriented 20-inch Goodyear Eagle F1 Supercar tires that come with the Scat Pack, the Challenger doesn’t have the ultimate grip of a Mustang GT. At 0.91 g, though, it’s pretty impressive. And the Scat Pack also brings upgraded brakes with larger rotors and Brembo four-piston calipers at all corners. That part is not so old-school. They allow the Challenger to stop from 70 mph in a scant 151 feet, with zero fade over repeated tests.

The point of all of this data recitation is that the driver of a Challenger R/T Scat Pack need not make excuses for its performance. It’s a more capable machine than most will assume.

Popular posts from this blog

McLaren 650S Sprint

McLaren’s new 650S model now comes in three flavors, the standard road going 650S, the competition-spec 650S GT3 for serious racers, and now there’s the 650S Sprint which is aimed at track enthusiasts who still want a little bit of comfort. The 650S Sprint also replaces the MP4-12C-based 12C Sprint as McLaren’s track toy for the super-rich. Compared to the road model, the 650S Sprint features increased downforce and better cooling airflow to the 3.8 litre twin-turbocharged V8. It also features a competition-spec fuel tank and quick-fill cap, a larger radiator borrowed from the GT3 car, a new hood with additional cooling ducts for the radiator, front wing louvres for improved airflow, reduced ride height and recalibrated damping and spring rates, 19-inch center-locking race wheels with either Pirelli slicks or wet tires, onboard air jack system, and an upgraded braking system. On the inside the McLaren 650S Sprint features a stripped-out design with a FIA-approved rol...

Peugeot RC

The RC concept was designed at the Peugeot Style Centre. Intended as a true enthusiasts car, the real innovation lay in the fact that the car was designed as an "affordable" sports car. The Peugeot RC was the concept car that paved the way for the 2008 Peugeot RC HYmotion4 concept. Peugeot used the 2002 RC concept to compare performance and economy differences between comparable petrol and diesel engines. As an affordable sports car the RC had to deliver not only in terms of price, but there was the engine, the size and running costs, as well as driver comforts to consider. A wide panoramic windscreen and the cab forward seating helps the driver see all around the car and compensates for the effect caused by the length of the car. In the Petrol vs. Diesel experiment, Peugeot aimed to prove that an HDi engine could match the performance levels achieved from a petrol engine. And to demonstrate that it was not unreasonable to put an HDi engine in a sports car. The 2 resulti...

Maserati Ghibli vs BMW 6 Series : Which Will You Buy?

When considering vehicles like Maserati Ghibli and the BWM 6 Series Gran Coupe, both reflect an effort toward blending dignified luxury with exhilarating performance. Though beholding vehicles of this caliber is always an exercise most fruitfully left to the natural eye, the image above serves as a simple example of each sedan’s inherent dignity. In lieu of experiencing each vehicle’s performance profile from behind the wheel, the table provided similarly works to demonstrate what both Ghibli and BMW’s 6 series have been engineered to accomplish. Comparing the Maserati Ghibli vs. BMW 6 Series in this regard yields a number of important emphases. Local clients will notice that both vehicles develop their identity around six-cylinder engines with a pair of strategic turbochargers. Yet regardless of identical displacement and analogous induction technology, Maserati serves its Ghibli clients with significantly greater quantities of horsepower and torque. In addition to t...