Skip to main content

LaFerrari

The night I was scheduled to leave for Maranello, Italy, to drive the LaFerrari, Car and Driver hosted a party in New York for the annual auto show. The guests included three racing heroes you’d recognize from the Kodachromes: David Hobbs, Sam Posey, and Brian Redman. These gents hail from the golden age of motorsport, when every race weekend seemed to darken into an orgy of gore and fire.
I apologized in advance to Redman for having to leave the party early. I told him that duty called, and that I was off to drive this car, the latest in a line of rolling laboratory experiments stretching back through the Enzo, F50, F40, and 288 GTO. I also confessed that I was slightly terrified to tangle with the thing. He sized me up and said, “You should be.”

I’ve driven cars that have tried to kill me before, but none with such a vast résumé of homicidal know-how. Some have threatened to slide off the road without warning, some have tried to collapse my organs with g-forces, and some have ached to impale me on their sharp interior surfaces. This one does it all. There is a video of Kimi Räikkönen, Ferrari F1 driver and a racer of almost Mario Andretti–like versatility, driving the LaFerrari (the TheFerrari?) at the brand’s Fiorano test track. There are flames spitting out of the car’s exhaust pipes. There are deafening shrieks. There is imminent loss of control at every corner. And then, finally, a lurid, frame-filling spin onto the grass. If Kimi couldn’t corral the surrealist bestiality packed into this car’s short wheelbase, what hope did I, someone who has never even been to Finland, really have?
The LaFerrari uses its stupid name as a feint, belittling a specification that is as serious as an Apollo mission. Its 950-hp hybrid powertrain shames Ferrari’s F14 T F1 car by maybe 200 horses (actual F1 power figures are undisclosed). Its center of gravity is 1.4 inches lower than the Enzo’s, and it uses a carbon-fiber tub baked in the same autoclaves as Ferrari’s F1 cars. At speed, its aerodynamics provide the car with one gorilla’s worth of downforce (800 pounds). The brakes are cross-drilled and vented carbon-ceramic rotors the size of crash cymbals.
There are more-powerful cars on sale. There are cars with more downforce and cars with even bigger and blacker brakes. But the LaFerrari represents a singularity. It is less a conventional supercar than a carefully orchestrated system of technologies resulting in something both brutally animalistic and mechanically pristine.

We are in Ferrari’s F1 shop, where Franco Cimatti, the head of road-car development, is backdropped by four huge autoclaves, big brewery-vat-looking things laid on their sides. This is where the LaFerrari’s carbon-fiber tub gets baked, right alongside those of the racing cars. Cimatti, thin, with close-cropped hair and wire-rimmed glasses, says: “If you get the physics right, everything else falls into place. A low center of gravity is key.”
He planned the car’s architecture around its seating position. His original idea was to lay the driver down into an almost F1-like recumbency: legs up and backrest at chaise angle. But he found that 32 degrees is as far as you can recline a non-F1–driving human before his front neck muscles start to compress and his breathing becomes strained. Still, Cimatti got the driver 2.4 inches lower than in the Enzo by easing him back a bit and removing the seat, separating the driver’s rear from the tub with just an Alcantara-swathed pad. Without a seat’s springs or compliance, there is no filter to muffle chassis feedback.
Without a seat, though, it would have been kind of awkward and somewhat humiliating to get in and out of the car. So Ferrari cut away the sills and integrated them into the batwings, hinging the now large and deep doors on the A-pillars and roof, endurance-car style.

Popular posts from this blog

KTM X-Bow Superlight

The extensive use of bare carbon fibre has kept the weight to a minimum The KTM X-Bow Superlight is one of the variants of the KTM X-Bow model range. As the name suggests the Superlight is the lightest model in the range - but not by much, the base model KTM X-Bow is just 5 kg (11 lbs) heavier. Although the Superlight is a full 40 kg (88 lbs) lighter than the GT4 version. The weight reductions to the KTM X-Bow Superlight have been made possible through the extensive use of carbon fibre. The monocoque structure with integrated crash protection is composed entirely of carbon fibre and left unpainted to show of the carbon fibre weave. The few body panels which are fitted to the X-Bow Superlight are also formed from carbon fibre. Additional weight savings were also achieved through the use of unique light-alloy wheels finished in a dark lacquer. Powering the KTM X-Bow Superlight is the same Audi-sourced 2.0 litre turbocharged engine found in all the X-Bow models. This engine puts out 24...

McLaren 650S Sprint

McLaren’s new 650S model now comes in three flavors, the standard road going 650S, the competition-spec 650S GT3 for serious racers, and now there’s the 650S Sprint which is aimed at track enthusiasts who still want a little bit of comfort. The 650S Sprint also replaces the MP4-12C-based 12C Sprint as McLaren’s track toy for the super-rich. Compared to the road model, the 650S Sprint features increased downforce and better cooling airflow to the 3.8 litre twin-turbocharged V8. It also features a competition-spec fuel tank and quick-fill cap, a larger radiator borrowed from the GT3 car, a new hood with additional cooling ducts for the radiator, front wing louvres for improved airflow, reduced ride height and recalibrated damping and spring rates, 19-inch center-locking race wheels with either Pirelli slicks or wet tires, onboard air jack system, and an upgraded braking system. On the inside the McLaren 650S Sprint features a stripped-out design with a FIA-approved rol...

Maserati Ghibli vs BMW 6 Series : Which Will You Buy?

When considering vehicles like Maserati Ghibli and the BWM 6 Series Gran Coupe, both reflect an effort toward blending dignified luxury with exhilarating performance. Though beholding vehicles of this caliber is always an exercise most fruitfully left to the natural eye, the image above serves as a simple example of each sedan’s inherent dignity. In lieu of experiencing each vehicle’s performance profile from behind the wheel, the table provided similarly works to demonstrate what both Ghibli and BMW’s 6 series have been engineered to accomplish. Comparing the Maserati Ghibli vs. BMW 6 Series in this regard yields a number of important emphases. Local clients will notice that both vehicles develop their identity around six-cylinder engines with a pair of strategic turbochargers. Yet regardless of identical displacement and analogous induction technology, Maserati serves its Ghibli clients with significantly greater quantities of horsepower and torque. In addition to t...