Skip to main content

Mercedes-Benz SLK-class

Care to shift for yourself but resolutely abstain from anything not built by Mercedes-Benz? Your choices, good eccentric sir, are excruciatingly limited. So limited, in fact, that the correct word is “choice,” not “choices.” The 2015 SLK250 is the only U.S.-market vehicle wearing the three-pointed star to offer a stick shift. Since buyers selecting the manual represent only a tiny percentage of SLK customers—themselves a tiny fraction of the buying populace, with just 4757 new SLKs sold in 2013 and 4353 moved in the first eleven months of 2014—this test was, for the most part, born from our sheer curiosity.
ONE OF ONE, WITH SIX SPEEDS
To put the SLK250’s position in the loneliest of light, it should be mentioned that not only is every other Mercedes-Benz sold in America automatic-only, but so, too, is the entire high-performance AMG lineup. We figure that Mercedes, considering the SLK’s overtly sporty competitors such as the Audi TT, the BMW Z4, and the Porsche Boxster, needs a manual to establish at least some sporting credentials.

The manual transmission certainly increases the SLK’s driver-engagement factor, and we appreciated the shifter’s tight throws and the clutch’s precise takeup. We’d christen the transmission a success were it not for the outdated engine it’s mated to. The 1.8-liter four-cylinder turbo’s boost is slow to build, making rev-matched downshifts tricky and lending the powertrain an air of sluggishness. We might be Savers of the Manuals, but this manual’s savior is a different engine. Subbing in the 2015 C-class’s turbocharged 2.0-liter four would be a good step in the right direction. (This may happen when the SLK is updated within a year or so, but we understand that the manual may be dropped at that time.)
It’s a shame about the engine, because the SLK’s chassis surprises and delights with a playful tail-happy attitude. Disable the stability control, vector the SLK’s nose into a tight corner while dabbing the brakes, and the back end whips around in a decisive, easily controlled manner. Our test car came equipped with the optional Dynamic Handling package ($990), which includes adaptive dampers with Sport and Comfort modes, as well as the Sport package ($2500), which brought 18-inch AMG wheels, a body kit, and red ambient cabin lighting.
Hampered slightly by axle hop off the line, the SLK nonetheless hit 60 mph in 6.3 seconds and circled our skidpad to the tune of 0.95 g. That zero-to-60 figure is 0.9-second off the 302-hp SLK350’s pace, but the skidpad result is stickier by 0.06 g. The SLK’s steering is perfectly weighted and effort builds smoothly as cornering forces increase, although nuanced road feel is left out of the equation. The brakes are reassuring in spite of a pedal that could be firmer, and the binders halt the little roadster from 70 mph in just 160 feet.

SIBLINGS FROM STUTTGART MAY BE CLOSER THAN THEY APPEAR
In more sedate scenarios, the SLK tries mightily to impersonate its SL-class sibling. It only partially succeeds. It might share much of its aesthetic with the SL—minus that car’s awkward detailing and odd proportions—but the SLK lacks a good measure of its bigger brother’s luxury vibe. A lot of road and tire noise penetrates the cabin, and the turbo four booms at highway speeds. Over chassis-twisting obstacles, the roof elements squeak and groan, but it should be noted that the lid’s generous glass area affords visibility unmatched by most other convertible tops. Our test car’s $2500 electrochromic “Magic Sky Control” fixed sunroof adds to the airy sensation, and it brings extra relief to the tight cockpit.
The small-but-upscale roadster segment is a shrinking one, but the SLK still stands near the top. At a starting price of $44,875, this Mercedes offers decent value, with power seats, Bluetooth, rain-sensing wipers, 17-inch wheels with summer tires, and the convertible hardtop standard.

Popular posts from this blog

McLaren P2 by Rakesh

The McLaren P2 is a concept created by Rakesh Bag , a Student of The Aditya Birla Public School , Veraval , Gujarat from INDIA The styling of the McLaren P2 is more attractive and less clinical than the McLaren P1 , but you can bet your entire worldly possessions on the fact every last millimetre of the bodywork has been extensivley analysed in the windtunnel. The front is unique and original, the way lower part of the bumper flows back into the ‘C’ shaped headlights is inspired. And the P2’s rear end has got to be one of the best in the business. Stunning. “the McLaren P1 and P2 will be the result of 50 years of racing and road car heritage. Twenty years ago we raised the supercar performance bar with the McLaren F1 and our goal with the McLaren P1 and P2 is to redefine it once again.” “Our aim is not necessarily to be the fastest in absolute top speed but to be the quickest and most rewarding series production road car on a circuit,” adds McLaren Automotive Managing Director Anton...

Lamborghini Canto – What the Murcielago could have been?

Back in the late 1990s, when Lamborghini were starting to realise they needed a replacement for the ageing Diablo, they started reviewing design proposals from various automotive design firms. Zagato’s offering was the Zagato L147 SuperDiablo, or as it was to be later known, the Lamborghini Canto. The Lamborghini Canto first appeared in 1998, it arrived only two years after another Zagato designed Lamborghini concept had been unveiled, the Diablo-based Raptor. The cars shared a number of similar features, including the wraparound windows, triangular lateral air intakes, and trademark double-bubble roof. However of the two, the earlier Raptor was probably the better looking. Clearly Ferdinand Piech – head of the Volkswagen Group – thought so too. After VW bought Lamborghini in 1999, one of his first decisions was to review the Canto’s development and redesign the concept. The car was re-engineered and the rear extensively restyled to include smaller air intakes....

Lamborghini Resonare Concept

The Lamborghini Resonare concept was created by 29-year-old Polish designer Pawel Czyzewski, it took him whole year to complete in exterior and interior details by using the Autodesk 3DS MAX software for modeling and rendering. According to Pawel Czyzewski, the main goal was to create a very futuristic, luxury, provocative and aggressive look, while still keep the Lamborghini style with the body line of the brand. Pawel Czyzewski was born in 1985 and currently resides in Lubin, Poland. He graduated from the University of Maria Curie-Sklodowska in Lublin and is focused on: Automotive Design, Industrial Design, and Interior Design. Some of the most successful projects of car concepts designs by Pawel Czyzewski include the: Gangloff Bugatti, Ferrari Invisum, Mazda Tamashii, Tricar Invisum, Arrano Invisum, Legarto Invisum and the Invisum among others. Have more information about this car than please comment us or email us at roadstrikersIN@gmail.com Thank you