Skip to main content

Ferrari California T (2014)

The new 2014 Ferrari California T is the first of a new generation of turbocharged road cars from Maranello. But does a pair of blowers enhance or detract from the Ferrari experience? We went to Tuscany to find out when we reviewed the new California T.

Turbocharging a Ferrari? That sounds like a capital offence!

Don’t be so hasty. Have you forgotten the F40 and 288 GTO? Hardly lacking in character were they? And before them, in the early 1980s Ferrari built a series of 2.0-litre turbocharged 208 sports cars to circumnavigate some tough Italian tax laws that made cars with big-capacity engines hideously expensive to run in the home market.

You had better get used to the idea because next year’s 458 replacement will use a tweaked version of this California’s 3.8-litre V8, too.

Run me through some of the technical highlights on the 2014 Ferrari California T. It’s a Maserati engine, isn’t it?

Ferrari builds a blown 3.8 for Maserati, but this isn’t it. Only the proper Ferrari engine features the flat-plane crank, which gives a different firing order, different sound and completely different character.

Ferrari has gone to great lengths to make it sound and feel like a naturally aspirated engine, creating complicated three-piece exhaust manifolds with equal length pipes, fast-spooling twin-scroll turbos and even managing the boost level to tailor the torque curve.

What do you mean?

Manufacturers often crow about having a torque curve that’s flatter than a dining table, but cars like that are often dull to drive because the rate of acceleration doesn’t increase with revs like it does in a performance-tuned petrol engine.

So in gears 1-3 of the California T’s seven-speed dual-clutch ’box you get a maximum of 443lb ft of torque, but that maximum is reached in the mid-upper end of the rev range. In seventh gear, by contrast, where low and mid-range torque is far more useful than top-end power, there’s more torque (557lb ft), and it arrives much earlier.

That compares with 368lb ft for the old California, while power increases from 483bhp to 552bhp. The idea is that you get the feel of a naturally aspirated engine when going through the gears, plus the easy pace of a turbo engine when you need top-gear go on the motorway.

That’s the theory covered, but how does it work in practice when you drive the Ferrari California T?

It’s impressive. Yes, there’s that unmistakable lull between planting your right foot and the turbos working their magic, but it’s fleeting, and quickly forgotten, and while the new engine doesn’t wind quite as high - 7500rpm, instead of 8000rpm -  it does at least pull hard right to the redline.

The 0-62mph time drops from 3.8sec to 3.6sec, but up to 124mph, the difference is more than 2.0sec, and the mid-range punch means this is night and day faster on real roads. It sounds reasonably rousing, too, if not exactly tuneful. The new 2014 Cali T certainly doesn’t scream like a 458, but neither did the last car. This is meant to be a GT, remember, not a car to thrash for 10 minutes before returning it to its garage slumber and reaching for the Paracetamol. But if we’re talking soundtracks, an Aston V12 engine has it licked.

What about the green gains on the California T? That’s why it’s gone turbocharged, after all…

Ferrari says the new car is 15% more economical in real conditions. CO2 output falls from 270g/km to 250g/km. Not that you’ll be running one of these as a company car, of course.

What else is new on the 2014 Ferrari California T?

Well it looks vastly better, for a start. The biggest improvement is at the rear, which ditches the stacked tailpipes and lowers the bootlid’s leading edge to create a much leaner-looking car.

There’s still a lot of metal beyond the cabin (to be fair, the boot is huge), but it’s now balanced by the reshaped front wings, more aggressive grille and headlights, two bonnet vents, and deeply coved flanks.

Popular posts from this blog

McLaren P2 by Rakesh

The McLaren P2 is a concept created by Rakesh Bag , a Student of The Aditya Birla Public School , Veraval , Gujarat from INDIA The styling of the McLaren P2 is more attractive and less clinical than the McLaren P1 , but you can bet your entire worldly possessions on the fact every last millimetre of the bodywork has been extensivley analysed in the windtunnel. The front is unique and original, the way lower part of the bumper flows back into the ‘C’ shaped headlights is inspired. And the P2’s rear end has got to be one of the best in the business. Stunning. “the McLaren P1 and P2 will be the result of 50 years of racing and road car heritage. Twenty years ago we raised the supercar performance bar with the McLaren F1 and our goal with the McLaren P1 and P2 is to redefine it once again.” “Our aim is not necessarily to be the fastest in absolute top speed but to be the quickest and most rewarding series production road car on a circuit,” adds McLaren Automotive Managing Director Anton...

Lamborghini Canto – What the Murcielago could have been?

Back in the late 1990s, when Lamborghini were starting to realise they needed a replacement for the ageing Diablo, they started reviewing design proposals from various automotive design firms. Zagato’s offering was the Zagato L147 SuperDiablo, or as it was to be later known, the Lamborghini Canto. The Lamborghini Canto first appeared in 1998, it arrived only two years after another Zagato designed Lamborghini concept had been unveiled, the Diablo-based Raptor. The cars shared a number of similar features, including the wraparound windows, triangular lateral air intakes, and trademark double-bubble roof. However of the two, the earlier Raptor was probably the better looking. Clearly Ferdinand Piech – head of the Volkswagen Group – thought so too. After VW bought Lamborghini in 1999, one of his first decisions was to review the Canto’s development and redesign the concept. The car was re-engineered and the rear extensively restyled to include smaller air intakes....

Lamborghini Resonare Concept

The Lamborghini Resonare concept was created by 29-year-old Polish designer Pawel Czyzewski, it took him whole year to complete in exterior and interior details by using the Autodesk 3DS MAX software for modeling and rendering. According to Pawel Czyzewski, the main goal was to create a very futuristic, luxury, provocative and aggressive look, while still keep the Lamborghini style with the body line of the brand. Pawel Czyzewski was born in 1985 and currently resides in Lubin, Poland. He graduated from the University of Maria Curie-Sklodowska in Lublin and is focused on: Automotive Design, Industrial Design, and Interior Design. Some of the most successful projects of car concepts designs by Pawel Czyzewski include the: Gangloff Bugatti, Ferrari Invisum, Mazda Tamashii, Tricar Invisum, Arrano Invisum, Legarto Invisum and the Invisum among others. Have more information about this car than please comment us or email us at roadstrikersIN@gmail.com Thank you